Unsmoked back bacon vs Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Unsmoked back bacon | Smoked Back Bacon Rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 227 kcal |
| Fat | 12.6 g | 16.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 19.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked back bacon has 18% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 227 kcal).
- Unsmoked back bacon has 24% less fat (12.6 g vs 16.5 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon has 15% less saturated fat (5 g vs 5.9 g).
- Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 13% less salt (2.5 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Unsmoked back bacon
Not available.
Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Pork loin (97%), salt, preservatives (sodium nitrate, sodium nitrite), antioxidant (sodium ascorbate)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Unsmoked back bacon or Smoked Back Bacon Rashers?
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked back bacon has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 227 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.