Filet de bacon vs Unsmoked back bacon
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de bacon | Unsmoked back bacon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 186 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 12.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 17.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bacon has 34% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 186 kcal).
- Filet de bacon has 72% less fat (3.5 g vs 12.6 g).
- Filet de bacon has 74% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 5 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon has 89% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Filet de bacon has 27% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Filet de bacon has 19% more protein (22 g vs 17.9 g).
- Filet de bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de bacon
Not available.
Unsmoked back bacon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de bacon or Unsmoked back bacon?
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bacon has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Unsmoked back bacon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.