Comparison

Filet de bacon vs Unsmoked back bacon

Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de baconUnsmoked back bacon
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — —
Calories 123 kcal 186 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 12.6 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 5 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.1 g
Salt 2.1 g 2.9 g
Protein 22 g 17.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de bacon has 34% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 186 kcal).
  • Filet de bacon has 72% less fat (3.5 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 74% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 5 g).
  • Unsmoked back bacon has 89% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 27% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 19% more protein (22 g vs 17.9 g).
  • Filet de bacon has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Filet de bacon

Not available.

Unsmoked back bacon

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de bacon or Unsmoked back bacon?

Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de bacon has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Unsmoked back bacon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons