Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers vs Filet de bacon
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers
Filet de bacon
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dry Cured Outdoor Bred Briti... | Filet de bacon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 166 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bacon has 26% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 166 kcal).
- Filet de bacon has 62% less fat (3.5 g vs 9.2 g).
- Filet de bacon has 60% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.3 g).
Ingredients
Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers
British Pork, Sea Salt, Sugar, Preservative: Sodium Nitrite, Sodium Nitrate; Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate.
Filet de bacon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers or Filet de bacon?
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bacon has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 166 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dry Cured Outdoor Bred British Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.