Back bacon vs Bacon Grill Bacon Roll
Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Back bacon | Bacon Grill Bacon Roll |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 166 kcal | 317 kcal |
| Fat | 10.8 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.2 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Back bacon has 48% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 317 kcal).
- Back bacon has 57% less fat (10.8 g vs 25 g).
- Back bacon has 58% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 10 g).
- Back bacon has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Back bacon has 17% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Back bacon has 24% more protein (17 g vs 13 g).
- Back bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
- Back bacon is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bacon Grill Bacon Roll lists: Milk, Pork.
Ingredients
Back bacon
British Pork (86%), Water (10%), Curing Salt (Salt Preservative: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate)
Bacon Grill Bacon Roll
pork (43%), mechanically separated pork, water, pork fat, maize starch, pork rind, salt, milk protein, stabiliser (sodium triphosphate), smoke flavouring, sugar, preservative (sodium nitrite), spice extracts
FAQ
Which is healthier: Back bacon or Bacon Grill Bacon Roll?
Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Back bacon has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Back bacon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.