Atún con tomate vs Atún claro al natural
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Atún con tomate | Atún claro al natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 99 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, [{"value":"pescado"}] |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún claro al natural has 36% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Atún claro al natural has 86% less fat (1.2 g vs 8.5 g).
- Atún claro al natural has 73% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Atún claro al natural has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Atún con tomate has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Atún claro al natural has 19% more protein (21 g vs 17 g).
- Atún claro al natural has the better Nutri-Score.
- Atún claro al natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Atún claro al natural lists: [{"value":"pescado"}].
Ingredients
Atún con tomate
Thon 65 et sauce tomate 35 (eau, hui\e de soja, concentré de tomate, glucose, sucre, sel et arôme).
Atún claro al natural
_Atún_ claro, agua, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Atún con tomate or Atún claro al natural?
Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atún claro al natural has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.