Comparison

Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft vs Atún con tomate

Overall, Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFisch Thunfisch Filets in ei...Atún con tomate
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 119 kcal 155 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 8.5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 1.5 g
Sugars 0 g 2 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0.4 g
Protein 27.8 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has 23% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 155 kcal).
  • Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has 89% less fat (0.9 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has 80% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has no sugar, while Atún con tomate has 2 g.
  • Atún con tomate has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has 39% more protein (27.8 g vs 17 g).
  • Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft

77% Thunfisch, Wasser, Speisesalz

Atún con tomate

Thon 65 et sauce tomate 35 (eau, hui\e de soja, concentré de tomate, glucose, sucre, sel et arôme).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft or Atún con tomate?

Overall, Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fisch Thunfisch Filets in eigenem Saft has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons