Comparison

Albacore Tuna vs Atún claro al natural

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlbacore TunaAtún claro al natural
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 127 kcal 99 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 23.2 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish, [{"value":"pescado"}]

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Atún claro al natural has 22% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 127 kcal).
  • Atún claro al natural has 66% less fat (1.2 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Atún claro al natural has 62% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Albacore Tuna has no sugar, while Atún claro al natural has 0.5 g.
  • Albacore Tuna has 93% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Only Atún claro al natural lists: [{"value":"pescado"}].

Ingredients

Albacore Tuna

albacore tuna, sea salt

Atún claro al natural

_Atún_ claro, agua, sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Albacore Tuna or Atún claro al natural?

Overall, Atún claro al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Atún claro al natural has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 127 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Albacore Tuna has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons