Comparison
Arachides coques vs Amandes
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Arachides coques | Amandes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 610 kcal | 613 kcal |
| Fat | 49.1 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.4 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 5.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.6 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 22.8 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Peanuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amandes has 55% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 8.4 g).
- Amandes has 37% less sugar (3.7 g vs 5.9 g).
- Amandes has 22% more fiber (11 g vs 8.6 g).
- Amandes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Arachides coques lists: Peanuts.
- Only Amandes lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Arachides coques
Arachides coques. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque
Amandes
amandes décortiquées,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Arachides coques or Amandes?
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arachides coques has fewer calories: 610 kcal versus 613 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amandes has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.