Comparison
Amandes vs Cacahuètes grillées et salées
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Amandes | Cacahuètes grillées et salée... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 613 kcal | 623 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 50 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 7.7 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amandes has 68% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 12 g).
- Amandes has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Amandes has 30% more fiber (11 g vs 7.7 g).
- Cacahuètes grillées et salées has 15% more protein (26 g vs 22 g).
- Amandes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Amandes lists: Nuts.
- Only Cacahuètes grillées et salées lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Amandes
amandes décortiquées,
Cacahuètes grillées et salées
Cacahuète, huile de tournesol, sel de Cuisine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Amandes or Cacahuètes grillées et salées?
Overall, Amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amandes has fewer calories: 613 kcal versus 623 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Amandes has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Amandes vs Graines de chanvre compl...
Souchet épluché bio vs Cacahuètes grillées et s...
Notenmix vs Cacahuètes grillées et s...
Amandes vs Notenmix
Amandes vs Souchet épluché bio
Arachides coques vs Cacahuètes grillées et s...
Date et seed nut mix vs Cacahuètes grillées et s...
Arachides coques vs Amandes