Comparison

Anchois en tempura vs Filet de Sébaste

Overall, Filet de Sébaste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAnchois en tempuraFilet de Sébaste
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 211 kcal 89 kcal
Fat 9.7 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 12 g 18.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, GlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de Sébaste has 58% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 211 kcal).
  • Filet de Sébaste has 85% less fat (1.5 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Filet de Sébaste has 67% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Filet de Sébaste has no sugar, while Anchois en tempura has 0.5 g.
  • Filet de Sébaste has 71% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Filet de Sébaste has 36% more protein (18.8 g vs 12 g).
  • Filet de Sébaste has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Anchois en tempura lists: Fish, Gluten.

Ingredients

Anchois en tempura

Filets d'anchois avec peau (poissons) 50% [Engraulis encrasicolus sauvage pêché en Atlantique Nord-Est (FAO 27), Atlantique Centre-Est (FAO 34), Méditerranée (FAO 37), eau, chapelure 15% [farine de blé gluten), eau, sel, levure], farine de blé (gluten), huile de tournesol, blanc d eut (liquide, pasteurisé), amidon de mais, sel, jus de citron concentre.

Filet de Sébaste

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Anchois en tempura or Filet de Sébaste?

Overall, Filet de Sébaste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de Sébaste has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de Sébaste has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons