Comparison

8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska vs Omega 3 fish fingers

Overall, 8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient8 portions panées de Colin d...Omega 3 fish fingers
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 168 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 6.4 g 9.1 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0.8 g
Protein 12 g 12 g
Additives50
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska has 19% fewer calories (168 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • 8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska has 30% less fat (6.4 g vs 9.1 g).
  • Omega 3 fish fingers has 100% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0 g).
  • 8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Omega 3 fish fingers is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska

Filet de colin d'Alaska 72% (Theragra chalcogramma pêché dans l'océan Pacifique) qualité sans arête, farine de blé, huile de colza et de tournesol, eau, amidon transformé de blé, fécule de pomme de terre, gluten de blé, sel, poudres à lever (diphosphate disodique, carbonate acide de sodium), poivre.

Omega 3 fish fingers

Alaska Pollock (FISH) (58%), Breadcrumb Coating (WHEAT Flour, Water, Potato Starch, Salt, Paprika, Yeast, Turmeric).Rapeseed oil

FAQ

Which is healthier: 8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska or Omega 3 fish fingers?

Overall, 8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

8 portions panées de Colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 168 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Omega 3 fish fingers has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons