Colin d'Alaska Extra croustillant MSC vs Omega 3 fish fingers
Overall, Omega 3 fish fingers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Colin d'Alaska Extra croustillant MSC
Omega 3 fish fingers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d'Alaska Extra crousti... | Omega 3 fish fingers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 198 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 9.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d'Alaska Extra croustillant MSC has 33% less sugar (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Omega 3 fish fingers has 46% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Omega 3 fish fingers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Colin d'Alaska Extra croustillant MSC
Colin d'Alaska 63%, farine de blé, huile de colza, eau, amidon de blé, sel, levure, sucre, dextrose, gluten de blé, poudres à lever (carbonate d'ammonium, carbonate de magnésium), paprika.
Omega 3 fish fingers
Alaska Pollock (FISH) (58%), Breadcrumb Coating (WHEAT Flour, Water, Potato Starch, Salt, Paprika, Yeast, Turmeric).Rapeseed oil
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska Extra croustillant MSC or Omega 3 fish fingers?
Overall, Omega 3 fish fingers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d'Alaska Extra croustillant MSC has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d'Alaska Extra croustillant MSC has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.