Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fish & Chips vs Omega 3 fish fingers
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fis... | Omega 3 fish fingers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 207 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 9.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Mustard | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fish & Chips has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Omega 3 fish fingers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fish & Chips lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fish & Chips
Filet de Colin 49%, farine de _blé_ (_blé_, carbonate de calcium, fer, niacine, thiamine), eau, huile de colza, amidon de _blé_, sel, farine de riz, farine de maïs, _moutarde_, arômes naturels (dont _moutarde_), dextrose, poudres à lever (diphosphates, bicarbonate de sodium), poudre d'ail, gluten de _blé_, paprika, extrait d'épices
Omega 3 fish fingers
Alaska Pollock (FISH) (58%), Breadcrumb Coating (WHEAT Flour, Water, Potato Starch, Salt, Paprika, Yeast, Turmeric).Rapeseed oil
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fish & Chips or Omega 3 fish fingers?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fish & Chips has fewer calories: 207 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d'Alaska MSC façon Fish & Chips has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.