Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC vs Omega 3 fish fingers
Overall, Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tranches panées de Merlu bla... | Omega 3 fish fingers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 170 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 9.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has 18% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 208 kcal).
- Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has 26% less fat (6.7 g vs 9.1 g).
- Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has 33% less sugar (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC
Merlu blanc 64%, chapelure 12% (farine de blé 11%, sel, huile de colza, levure, épices), eau, farine de blé 5,4% huile de colza, amidon de blé, sel, poivre.
Omega 3 fish fingers
Alaska Pollock (FISH) (58%), Breadcrumb Coating (WHEAT Flour, Water, Potato Starch, Salt, Paprika, Yeast, Turmeric).Rapeseed oil
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC or Omega 3 fish fingers?
Overall, Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tranches panées de Merlu blanc MSC has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.