View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Шунка печена 3091
Шунка печена 3091 by KFM (КФМ) provides 89 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 18.9 g of protein. That is 40% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A. It is listed in the Hams category and comes in a 120 pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 serving (100 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 kcal | 89 kcal | 169 −47% | |
| Total fat | 1 g | 1 g | 1% | 8.1 −88% |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g | 3% | 3 −84% |
| Carbohydrates | 1 g | 1 g | 0% | 1.5 −34% |
| Total sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g | 0.8 −40% | |
| Protein | 18.9 g | 18.9 g | 38% | 22.4 −16% |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g | 3.1 −73% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1899 Hams products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hams
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Quantity
- 120
- Serving size
- 1 serving (100 g)
- Labels & certifications
- No gluten
- Sold in
- Bulgaria
- Barcode
- 3800202643091
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Recipe & label changes
-
September 24, 2026
- Nutri-Score: — → a
Changes to this product's label data recorded since Foodmetria started tracking it.
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Шунка печена 3091?
Шунка печена 3091 contains 89 kcal per 100 g and about 89 kcal per serving (1 serving (100 g)).
How much sugar is in Шунка печена 3091?
Шунка печена 3091 has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Шунка печена 3091 healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated September 24, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More hams
View all →
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4