Rückenspeck

by WKS W.Heine GmbH 400g in Specks Barcode 27134566
Bad nutritional quality
Processed food
Green-Score
f
Environmental impact estimate

Rückenspeck by WKS W.Heine GmbH provides 818 kcal per 100 g, with 1 g of sugars and 1 g of protein. That is 147% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Specks category and comes in a 400g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
90 g · High
Saturated fat
35 g · High
Sugars
1 g · Low
Salt
1.5 g · Moderate

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 818 kcal 303 +170%
Total fat 90 g 21.6 +316%
Saturated fat 35 g 8.3 +324%
Carbohydrates 1 g 0.9 +9%
Total sugars 1 g 0.4 +147%
Added sugars 0 g 2.4 −100%
Protein 1 g 26.4 −96%
Salt 1.5 g 4 −62%

Category average across 89 Specks products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other specks

Calories higher 2%
Sugars higher 10%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat higher 2%
Protein top 99%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Schweinerückenspeck, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch.

Product details

Quantity
400g
Sold in
Germany
Barcode
27134566

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Rückenspeck?

Rückenspeck contains 818 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Rückenspeck?

Rückenspeck has 1 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Rückenspeck healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 26, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Rückenspeck? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More specks

View all →