Rökt Lantskinka

by Ica in Hams Barcode 7318690088943
Poor nutritional quality

Rökt Lantskinka by Ica provides 76 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 17 g of protein. That is 40% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Hams category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
1.4 g · Low
Saturated fat
0.5 g · Low
Sugars
0.5 g · Low
Salt
2.1 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 15 g

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 76 kcal 11 kcal 169 −55%
Total fat 1.4 g 0.2 g 0% 8.1 −83%
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.1 g 1% 3 −84%
Carbohydrates 1.5 g 0.2 g 0% 1.5
Total sugars 0.5 g 0.1 g 0.8 −40%
Protein 17 g 2.6 g 5% 22.4 −24%
Salt 2.1 g 0.3 g 3.1 −33%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1899 Hams products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other hams

Calories lower 1%
Sugars lower 25%
Salt lower 42%
Saturated fat lower 4%
Protein top 90%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Serving size
15 g
Sold in
Sweden
Barcode
7318690088943

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Rökt Lantskinka?

Rökt Lantskinka contains 76 kcal per 100 g and about 11 kcal per serving (15 g).

How much sugar is in Rökt Lantskinka?

Rökt Lantskinka has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Rökt Lantskinka healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated May 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Rökt Lantskinka? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More hams

View all →

More from Ica

View all →