Raspberry Topping, Wide-Mouth Jugs, 122 OZ
Raspberry Topping, Wide-Mouth Jugs, 122 OZ is listed in the Desserts category. That is 29% more sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food).
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 2 tbsp (37 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 14.2 −100% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 8 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 48.7 g | 18 g | 7% | 40.5 +20% |
| Total sugars | 37.8 g | 14 g | 29.3 +29% | |
| Added sugarsUSDA | 35.1 g | 13 g | 26% | 17.1 +105% |
| Dietary fiber | 2.7 g | 1 g | 4% | 1.6 +66% |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 4.9 −100% |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g | 0.8 −88% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3367 Desserts products on Foodmetria.
Serving size and added sugars from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from January 2026. Other values: Open Food Facts.
Compared with other desserts
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Red raspberries, sugar, water, corn syrup, modified corn starch, less than 2% of: citric acid, sodium citrate, sodium benzoate (preservative), natural flavor, propylene glycol, xanthan gum, carob bean gum, guar gum, red 40.
Additives 8
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Serving size
- 2 tbsp (37 g)
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 0027000119709
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How much sugar is in Raspberry Topping, Wide-Mouth Jugs, 122 OZ?
Raspberry Topping, Wide-Mouth Jugs, 122 OZ has 37.8 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Raspberry Topping, Wide-Mouth Jugs, 122 OZ healthy?
It is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 22, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
b NOVA 3 More desserts
View all →
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
c 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4