View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Coeurs de palmier
Coeurs de palmier by Barima provides 25 kcal per 100 g, with 0.2 g of sugars and 2.3 g of protein. That is 81% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C and it is classified as NOVA 3 (processed food). It is listed in the Hearts of palm category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 kcal | 30 −18% |
| Total fat | 4.2 g | 0.5 +804% |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 −100% |
| Carbohydrates | 1.4 g | 3.7 −62% |
| Total sugars | 0.2 g | 1.1 −81% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0 |
| Dietary fiber | 2.5 g | 2.4 +6% |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.4 −6% |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.7 +5% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 195 Hearts of palm products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hearts of palm
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
cœurs de palmier sauvage, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique
Additives 1
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Labels & certifications
- OrganicEU OrganicFR-BIO-01Ab agriculture biologique
- Sold in
- France
- Barcode
- 9501006980088
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Coeurs de palmier?
Coeurs de palmier contains 25 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Coeurs de palmier?
Coeurs de palmier has 0.2 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Coeurs de palmier healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 3 — processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 17, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 
a 
a NOVA 3 More hearts of palm
View all →
a NOVA 3 
c NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3