View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner
Mung beans
Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner by Ánglamark provides 323 kcal per 100 g, with 6.6 g of sugars and 24 g of protein. That is 137% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A and it is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Pulses category and comes in a 400g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 323 kcal | 258 +25% |
| Total fat | 1.2 g | 3.5 −66% |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.6 −53% |
| Carbohydrates | 46 g | 35.6 +29% |
| Total sugars | 6.6 g | 2.8 +137% |
| Dietary fiber | 16 g | 11.9 +35% |
| Protein | 24 g | 17.1 +41% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 −91% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 393 Pulses products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other pulses
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Mung beans (organic)
Product details
- Quantity
- 400g
- Labels & certifications
- OrganicEU OrganicNL-BIO-01
- Sold in
- Denmark
- Barcode
- 5700382759378
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner?
Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner contains 323 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner?
Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner has 6.6 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Is Änglamark Grønne Mung Bønner vegan?
Based on its ingredient list, it appears to be vegan. Always check the package label.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated August 14, 2024. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a
a NOVA 1
a NOVA 1
a NOVA 1 More pulses
View all →
c NOVA 4
c NOVA 4
c NOVA 4
b
a NOVA 1
a NOVA 1 More from Ánglamark
View all →
a NOVA 3
c NOVA 3
NOVA 3
c NOVA 3
c NOVA 1
b