Comparison

Worcestershire Sauce vs Star Piquante Sauce

Overall, Star Piquante Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWorcestershire SauceStar Piquante Sauce
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 96 kcal 84 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 4 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0 g
Sugars 18.8 g 0 g
Salt 2.9 g 0 g
Fiber 0.2 g —
Protein 0.8 g 3.1 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, GlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Star Piquante Sauce has 13% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 96 kcal).
  • Worcestershire Sauce has 78% less fat (0.9 g vs 4 g).
  • Star Piquante Sauce has no saturated fat, while Worcestershire Sauce has 0.4 g.
  • Star Piquante Sauce has no sugar, while Worcestershire Sauce has 18.8 g.
  • Star Piquante Sauce has no salt, while Worcestershire Sauce has 2.9 g.
  • Star Piquante Sauce has 74% more protein (3.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Star Piquante Sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Worcestershire Sauce lists: Fish, Gluten.

Ingredients

Worcestershire Sauce

Malt Vinegar (from Barley), Spirit Vinegar, Molasses, Sugar, Salt, Anchovies (Fish), Tamarind Extract, Onions, Garlic, Spice, Flavourings

Star Piquante Sauce

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Worcestershire Sauce or Star Piquante Sauce?

Overall, Star Piquante Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Star Piquante Sauce has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Star Piquante Sauce has less sugar: 0 g versus 18.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons