Worcestershire Sauce vs Marmite Reduced Salt
Overall, Marmite Reduced Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Worcestershire Sauce | Marmite Reduced Salt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 271 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 18.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 6.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 39 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Celery, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Worcestershire Sauce has 65% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 271 kcal).
- Marmite Reduced Salt has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Marmite Reduced Salt has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Marmite Reduced Salt has 97% less sugar (0.6 g vs 18.8 g).
- Worcestershire Sauce has 53% less salt (2.9 g vs 6.1 g).
- Marmite Reduced Salt has 98% more protein (39 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Worcestershire Sauce lists: Fish.
- Only Marmite Reduced Salt lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Worcestershire Sauce
Malt Vinegar (from Barley), Spirit Vinegar, Molasses, Sugar, Salt, Anchovies (Fish), Tamarind Extract, Onions, Garlic, Spice, Flavourings
Marmite Reduced Salt
yeast extract (contains barley, wheat oats, rye), salt, vegetable juice concentrate, vitamins (thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin b12 and folic acid), natural flavouring (contains celery)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Worcestershire Sauce or Marmite Reduced Salt?
Overall, Marmite Reduced Salt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Worcestershire Sauce has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Marmite Reduced Salt has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 18.8 g per 100 g.