Comparison

Worcestershire Sauce vs Worcester Sauce

Overall, Worcestershire Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWorcestershire SauceWorcester Sauce
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 31 kcal 147 kcal
Fat 0 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.7 g
Sugars 6.9 g 26.7 g
Salt 1 g 3.4 g
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g
Protein 0 g 3.3 g
Additives01
AllergensFishFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Worcestershire Sauce has 79% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 147 kcal).
  • Worcestershire Sauce has no fat, while Worcester Sauce has 3.3 g.
  • Worcestershire Sauce has no saturated fat, while Worcester Sauce has 0.7 g.
  • Worcestershire Sauce has 74% less sugar (6.9 g vs 26.7 g).
  • Worcestershire Sauce has 70% less salt (1 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Worcester Sauce has 100% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Worcester Sauce has 100% more protein (3.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Worcestershire Sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Worcester Sauce lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Worcestershire Sauce

Distilled white vinegar, molasses, sugar, water, salt, onions, anchovies, garlic, cloves, tamarind extract, natural flavorings, chili pepper extract.

Worcester Sauce

Malt Vinegar (Barley), Water, Molasses, Sugar, Salt, Onion, Tamarind Concentrate, Anchovy Paste (Fish), Chilli Powder, Ground Cloves, Garlic Powder, Lemon Oil, Paprika Extract, Flavourings.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Worcestershire Sauce or Worcester Sauce?

Overall, Worcestershire Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Worcestershire Sauce has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 147 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Worcestershire Sauce has less sugar: 6.9 g versus 26.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons