Comparison

Worcestershire Sauce vs Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce

Overall, Worcestershire Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWorcestershire SauceLea & Perrins Worcestershire...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 31 kcal 96 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.4 g
Sugars 6.9 g 19 g
Salt 1 g 2.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Worcestershire Sauce has 67% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 96 kcal).
  • Worcestershire Sauce has no fat, while Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce has 0.9 g.
  • Worcestershire Sauce has no saturated fat, while Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce has 0.4 g.
  • Worcestershire Sauce has 64% less sugar (6.9 g vs 19 g).
  • Worcestershire Sauce has 65% less salt (1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce has 100% more protein (0.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Worcestershire Sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Worcestershire Sauce

Distilled white vinegar, molasses, sugar, water, salt, onions, anchovies, garlic, cloves, tamarind extract, natural flavorings, chili pepper extract.

Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce

Moutazijn (van gerst), alcoholazijn, melasse, suiker, zout, ansjovis (vis), tamarinde-extract, ui, knoflook, specerijen, aroma's.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Worcestershire Sauce or Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce?

Overall, Worcestershire Sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Worcestershire Sauce has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Worcestershire Sauce has less sugar: 6.9 g versus 19 g per 100 g.

More comparisons