Worcester Sauce vs Worcestshire sauce
Overall, Worcestshire sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Worcester Sauce | Worcestshire sauce |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 147 kcal | 138 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 26.7 g | 22.6 g |
| Salt | 3.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Worcestshire sauce has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Worcestshire sauce has 85% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Worcestshire sauce has 15% less sugar (22.6 g vs 26.7 g).
- Worcestshire sauce has 32% less salt (2.3 g vs 3.4 g).
- Worcester Sauce has 85% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Worcester Sauce has 58% more protein (3.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Worcestshire sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
- Worcestshire sauce is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Worcester Sauce
Malt Vinegar (Barley), Water, Molasses, Sugar, Salt, Onion, Tamarind Concentrate, Anchovy Paste (Fish), Chilli Powder, Ground Cloves, Garlic Powder, Lemon Oil, Paprika Extract, Flavourings.
Worcestshire sauce
Barley Malt Vinegar, Spirit Vinegar, Molasses, Sugar, Fish Sauce (Anchovy (Fish), Salt, Sugar), Tamarind Extract, Salt, Garlic Powder, Ground Clove, Chilli Powder, Onion Powder.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Worcester Sauce or Worcestshire sauce?
Overall, Worcestshire sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Worcestshire sauce has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 147 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Worcestshire sauce has less sugar: 22.6 g versus 26.7 g per 100 g.