Comparison

Worcestshire sauce vs Lea & Perrins

Overall, Worcestshire sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWorcestshire sauceLea & Perrins
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 138 kcal 96 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 22.6 g 18 g
Salt 2.3 g 3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 1.4 g 2 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lea & Perrins has 31% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 138 kcal).
  • Worcestshire sauce has 75% less fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Lea & Perrins has 20% less sugar (18 g vs 22.6 g).
  • Worcestshire sauce has 23% less salt (2.3 g vs 3 g).
  • Worcestshire sauce has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Lea & Perrins has 30% more protein (2 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Worcestshire sauce has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Worcestshire sauce is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Worcestshire sauce

Barley Malt Vinegar, Spirit Vinegar, Molasses, Sugar, Fish Sauce (Anchovy (Fish), Salt, Sugar), Tamarind Extract, Salt, Garlic Powder, Ground Clove, Chilli Powder, Onion Powder.

Lea & Perrins

water, molasses, malt vinegar (from barley ), spirit vinegar, sugar, salt, anchovies , onions, tamarind extract, garlic, spice, flavours,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Worcestshire sauce or Lea & Perrins?

Overall, Worcestshire sauce has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lea & Perrins has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 138 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lea & Perrins has less sugar: 18 g versus 22.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons