Comparison

Worcester Sauce vs Lea & Perrins

Overall, Lea & Perrins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientWorcester SauceLea & Perrins
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 147 kcal 96 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0 g
Sugars 26.7 g 18 g
Salt 3.4 g 3 g
Fiber 3.3 g 0 g
Protein 3.3 g 2 g
Additives10
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lea & Perrins has 35% fewer calories (96 kcal vs 147 kcal).
  • Lea & Perrins has 40% less fat (2 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Lea & Perrins has no saturated fat, while Worcester Sauce has 0.7 g.
  • Lea & Perrins has 33% less sugar (18 g vs 26.7 g).
  • Lea & Perrins has 12% less salt (3 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Worcester Sauce has 100% more fiber (3.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Worcester Sauce has 40% more protein (3.3 g vs 2 g).

Ingredients

Worcester Sauce

Malt Vinegar (Barley), Water, Molasses, Sugar, Salt, Onion, Tamarind Concentrate, Anchovy Paste (Fish), Chilli Powder, Ground Cloves, Garlic Powder, Lemon Oil, Paprika Extract, Flavourings.

Lea & Perrins

water, molasses, malt vinegar (from barley ), spirit vinegar, sugar, salt, anchovies , onions, tamarind extract, garlic, spice, flavours,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Worcester Sauce or Lea & Perrins?

Overall, Lea & Perrins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lea & Perrins has fewer calories: 96 kcal versus 147 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lea & Perrins has less sugar: 18 g versus 26.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons