Comparison

Wildreismix vs Riso long e wild

Overall, Wildreismix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWildreismixRiso long e wild
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 334 kcal 351 kcal
Fat 0 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 7 g 3.4 g
Protein 10 g 9.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wildreismix has no fat, while Riso long e wild has 1.4 g.
  • Wildreismix has no saturated fat, while Riso long e wild has 0.5 g.
  • Wildreismix has no sugar, while Riso long e wild has 0.6 g.
  • Wildreismix has 51% more fiber (7 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Wildreismix has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Wildreismix

Long grain parboiled 85%, riz sauvage 15%. Tous les ingrédients agricoles sont issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Riso long e wild

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wildreismix or Riso long e wild?

Overall, Wildreismix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wildreismix has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wildreismix has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons