Comparison

Wholegrain Wraps vs Chili con Tempeh

Overall, Chili con Tempeh has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWholegrain WrapsChili con Tempeh
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 297 kcal 97 kcal
Fat 15 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 6.7 g 0.3 g
Sugars 1 g 2.1 g
Salt 1.4 g 0.7 g
Fiber 24.3 g 4.9 g
Protein 23.8 g 7 g
Additives100
AllergensGlutenSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chili con Tempeh has 67% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 297 kcal).
  • Chili con Tempeh has 91% less fat (1.4 g vs 15 g).
  • Chili con Tempeh has 96% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Wholegrain Wraps has 52% less sugar (1 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Chili con Tempeh has 49% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Wholegrain Wraps has 80% more fiber (24.3 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Wholegrain Wraps has 71% more protein (23.8 g vs 7 g).
  • Chili con Tempeh has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chili con Tempeh is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Wholegrain Wraps lists: Gluten.
  • Only Chili con Tempeh lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Wholegrain Wraps

Water, Wheat gluten, Wheat fibre, Whole grain Wheat flour, Vegetable palm fat, Modified Wheat starch, Wheat bran (1,3%), Emulsifier: mono-and Diglycerides of Fatty Acids, Salt, Acidifiers: Malic acid, Citric acid, Rasing agents: disodium pyrophosphate, sodium bicarbonate, Preservatives: Potassium sorbate, Calcium Propionate, Stabiliser: Guar Gum, Inactive yeast. For allergens including wheat and gluten, see ingredients in bold. May contain traces of soy and mustard.

Chili con Tempeh

Wasser, Tomaten passiert, Zuckermais, Rote Bohnen, Tempeh° (SOJAbohnen° 53%, Wasser, Rhizopus Starterkulturen) 11%, Schwarze Bohnen, Zwiebel, Leinsamenmehl, Tomaten - mark, Apfelessig, Gewürze, Kakaopulver, Zitronensaft, Chili 0,25%, Knoblaucho, Salz. Paus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wholegrain Wraps or Chili con Tempeh?

Overall, Chili con Tempeh has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chili con Tempeh has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 297 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wholegrain Wraps has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons