Comparison

High protein cream cheese 5765 vs Chili con Tempeh

Overall, Chili con Tempeh has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHigh protein cream cheese 57...Chili con Tempeh
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 362 kcal 97 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 1.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 2.1 g
Salt 0 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.8 g 4.9 g
Protein 0.4 g 7 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chili con Tempeh has 73% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 362 kcal).
  • High protein cream cheese 5765 has 82% less fat (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • High protein cream cheese 5765 has no sugar, while Chili con Tempeh has 2.1 g.
  • High protein cream cheese 5765 has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Chili con Tempeh has 84% more fiber (4.9 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Chili con Tempeh has 94% more protein (7 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Chili con Tempeh has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Chili con Tempeh is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Chili con Tempeh lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

High protein cream cheese 5765

modified starch

Chili con Tempeh

Wasser, Tomaten passiert, Zuckermais, Rote Bohnen, Tempeh° (SOJAbohnen° 53%, Wasser, Rhizopus Starterkulturen) 11%, Schwarze Bohnen, Zwiebel, Leinsamenmehl, Tomaten - mark, Apfelessig, Gewürze, Kakaopulver, Zitronensaft, Chili 0,25%, Knoblaucho, Salz. Paus kontrolliert biologischer Landwirtschaft.

FAQ

Which is healthier: High protein cream cheese 5765 or Chili con Tempeh?

Overall, Chili con Tempeh has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chili con Tempeh has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

High protein cream cheese 5765 has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons