Wholegrain vs Sultana Bran
Overall, Wholegrain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wholegrain | Sultana Bran |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 21.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 12.3 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 10.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wholegrain has 53% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 346 kcal).
- Sultana Bran has 16% less fat (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Wholegrain has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 21.5 g).
- Wholegrain has no salt, while Sultana Bran has 0.5 g.
- Sultana Bran has 85% more fiber (12.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Sultana Bran has 64% more protein (10.3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Wholegrain has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sultana Bran lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Wholegrain
Steamed parboiled wholegrain rice (98%), Sunflower oil.
Sultana Bran
Wholegrain Wheat (52%), Sultanas (25%), Wheat Bran (15%), Sugar, Barley Malt Extract, Salt, Iron, Vitamin E, Niacin, Pantothenic Acid, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Thiamin, Folic Acid, Riboflavin, Vitamin B6.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wholegrain or Sultana Bran?
Overall, Wholegrain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wholegrain has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wholegrain has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 21.5 g per 100 g.