Wheat Thins reduced fat vs Hogaza rustica
Overall, Hogaza rustica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wheat Thins reduced fat | Hogaza rustica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 414 kcal | 382 kcal |
| Fat | 12.1 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 13.8 g | 6.4 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 10.3 g | 7.6 g |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hogaza rustica has 70% less fat (3.6 g vs 12.1 g).
- Hogaza rustica has 80% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
- Hogaza rustica has 54% less sugar (6.4 g vs 13.8 g).
- Hogaza rustica has 24% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
- Wheat Thins reduced fat has 26% more fiber (10.3 g vs 7.6 g).
- Hogaza rustica has 43% more protein (12 g vs 6.9 g).
- Wheat Thins reduced fat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Wheat Thins reduced fat
WHOLE GRAIN WHEAT FLOUR, SUGAR, CANOLA OIL, CORNSTARCH, MALT SYRUP (FROM CORN AND BARLEY), SALT, REFINER'S SYRUP, LEAVENING (CALCIUM PHOSPHATE AND BAKING SODA)
Hogaza rustica
Harina de trigo 78%, harina de centeno 7%, aceite de girasol alto oleico 2.3%, gluten de trigo, azúcar, harina de centeno malteada, sal, levadura, harina de cebada malteada, agente de tratamiento de la harina: ácido ascórbico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wheat Thins reduced fat or Hogaza rustica?
Overall, Hogaza rustica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hogaza rustica has fewer calories: 382 kcal versus 414 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hogaza rustica has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 13.8 g per 100 g.