Ware Wieger Kruidkoek vs Peperkoek
Overall, Peperkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ware Wieger Kruidkoek | Peperkoek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 304 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 30.1 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Peperkoek has 31% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 304 kcal).
- Peperkoek has 94% less sugar (2.5 g vs 40 g).
- Peperkoek has 90% more fiber (30.1 g vs 3 g).
- Ware Wieger Kruidkoek has 38% more protein (3.2 g vs 2 g).
- Peperkoek has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ware Wieger Kruidkoek
ROGGEbloem, glucose-fructosestroop, suiker, water, specerijen, kaneel, rijsmiddelen (natriumwaterstofcarbonaat, dinatriumdifosfaat),zonnebloemolie.
Peperkoek
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ware Wieger Kruidkoek or Peperkoek?
Overall, Peperkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Peperkoek has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 304 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Peperkoek has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 40 g per 100 g.