Parelkandij vs Peperkoek
Overall, Peperkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parelkandij | Peperkoek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 313 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 30.1 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Peperkoek has 33% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 313 kcal).
- Peperkoek has 55% less fat (1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Peperkoek has 94% less sugar (2.5 g vs 40 g).
- Peperkoek has 90% more fiber (30.1 g vs 3 g).
- Parelkandij has 39% more protein (3.3 g vs 2 g).
- Only Parelkandij lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Parelkandij
Glucose-fructosestroop, _rogge_bloem (36%), water, parelsuiker (8%), suiker, rijsmiddelen (natriumwaterstofcarbonaat, dinatriumdifosfaat), kaneel, zonnebloemolie, tarwezetmeel, specerijen.
Peperkoek
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parelkandij or Peperkoek?
Overall, Peperkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Peperkoek has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 313 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Peperkoek has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 40 g per 100 g.