Volkoren peperkoek vs Peperkoek
Overall, Peperkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Volkoren peperkoek | Peperkoek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 17 g | 30.1 g |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Peperkoek has 10% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 233 kcal).
- Peperkoek has 50% less fat (1 g vs 2 g).
- Peperkoek has 49% less sugar (2.5 g vs 4.9 g).
- Peperkoek has 44% more fiber (30.1 g vs 17 g).
- Volkoren peperkoek has 51% more protein (4.1 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Volkoren peperkoek
ROGGEvolkorenmeel 40%, cichoreiwortelvezel, zoetstof (xylitol), water, stabilisator (glycerol), zonnebloemolie, rijsmiddelen(natriumwaterstofcarbonaat, dinatriumdifosfaat), specerijen, conserveermiddel (kaliumsorbaat), natuurlijk aroma.
Peperkoek
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Volkoren peperkoek or Peperkoek?
Overall, Peperkoek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Peperkoek has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Peperkoek has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.