Comparison

Vuna vs Plant-Based Salmon Fillet

Overall, Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVunaPlant-Based Salmon Fillet
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 279 kcal 200 kcal
Fat 19.9 g 11 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber 1.1 g 3.1 g
Protein 22.6 g 14 g
Additives04
AllergensGluten, WEIZENGLUTENGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has 28% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 279 kcal).
  • Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has 45% less fat (11 g vs 19.9 g).
  • Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has 57% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Vuna has no sugar, while Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has 0.6 g.
  • Vuna has 26% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has 65% more fiber (3.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Vuna has 38% more protein (22.6 g vs 14 g).
  • Only Vuna lists: WEIZENGLUTEN.

Ingredients

Vuna

Wasser, Erbsenprotein 18%, Rapsöl, WEIZENGLUTEN, Aromen, Zitrusfruchtfasern, Salz.

Plant-Based Salmon Fillet

Hydrated vegetable protein 71% (water, _wheat_ protein 14%), rapeseed oil, _wheat_ flour, pea protein, vinegar, _wheat_ fibres, natural flavourings, flaxseed oil, thickener (methylcellulose), stabiliser (sodiumalginate), potato fibres, low-sodium mineral sea salt (salt, chloride salt of potassium), colour (beetroot red), salt, preservative (sodium diacetate), iron, vitamin B12.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vuna or Plant-Based Salmon Fillet?

Overall, Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Plant-Based Salmon Fillet has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vuna has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons