Comparison

Vuna vs Veganer lachs

Overall, Veganer lachs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVunaVeganer lachs
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 279 kcal 209 kcal
Fat 19.9 g 13 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.2 g
Fiber 1.1 g 3.9 g
Protein 22.6 g 15 g
Additives04
AllergensGluten, WEIZENGLUTENNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Veganer lachs has 25% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 279 kcal).
  • Veganer lachs has 35% less fat (13 g vs 19.9 g).
  • Veganer lachs has 43% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Vuna has no sugar, while Veganer lachs has 0.5 g.
  • Vuna has 26% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Veganer lachs has 72% more fiber (3.9 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Vuna has 34% more protein (22.6 g vs 15 g).
  • Only Vuna lists: Gluten, WEIZENGLUTEN.

Ingredients

Vuna

Wasser, Erbsenprotein 18%, Rapsöl, WEIZENGLUTEN, Aromen, Zitrusfruchtfasern, Salz.

Veganer lachs

76% hydratisierte pflanzliche Proteine (Wasser, 20% WEIZENEIWEIB), Pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblumen, Rapssamen in unterschiedlichen Anteilen), Erbsenprotein, Branntweinessig, natürliche Aromen, Leinsamenöl, WEIZENSTROHFASERN, Verdickungsmittel (Methylcellulose), Stabilisator (Natriumalginat), Kartoffelfasern, reduziertes Natriumsalz, Wasser, Salz, Farbstoffe (Rote Beete), Konservierungsstoff (Natriumdiacetat), Eisen(II)Gluconat, Vitamin B12. Allergene: Kann Spuren von Soja, Ei und Milch enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vuna or Veganer lachs?

Overall, Veganer lachs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Veganer lachs has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vuna has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons