Comparison

Tuna Style Flakes vs Vuna

Overall, Tuna Style Flakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTuna Style FlakesVuna
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 194 kcal 279 kcal
Fat 7.5 g 19.9 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 2.3 g
Sugars 1.3 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.1 g
Protein 21 g 22.6 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenGluten, WEIZENGLUTEN

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tuna Style Flakes has 30% fewer calories (194 kcal vs 279 kcal).
  • Tuna Style Flakes has 62% less fat (7.5 g vs 19.9 g).
  • Tuna Style Flakes has 70% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Vuna has no sugar, while Tuna Style Flakes has 1.3 g.
  • Tuna Style Flakes has no salt, while Vuna has 0.9 g.
  • Vuna has 55% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Tuna Style Flakes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Vuna lists: WEIZENGLUTEN.

Ingredients

Tuna Style Flakes

Water, textured _wheat_ protein 29% (_wheat_ protein, _wheat_ flour), rapeseed oil, natural flavourings, dextrose, acidity regulator (citric acid), salt, radish concentrate, malted _barley_, carrot concentrate.

Vuna

Wasser, Erbsenprotein 18%, Rapsöl, WEIZENGLUTEN, Aromen, Zitrusfruchtfasern, Salz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tuna Style Flakes or Vuna?

Overall, Tuna Style Flakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuna Style Flakes has fewer calories: 194 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vuna has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons