Urid Dal Chilka vs Lenteja rápida
Overall, Lenteja rápida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Urid Dal Chilka | Lenteja rápida |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 306 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 16 g | 25 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lenteja rápida has 13% fewer calories (306 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Urid Dal Chilka has 47% less fat (1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Urid Dal Chilka has no saturated fat, while Lenteja rápida has 0.3 g.
- Lenteja rápida has 83% less sugar (1.2 g vs 7 g).
- Lenteja rápida has 36% more fiber (25 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Urid Dal Chilka
Black Lentils
Lenteja rápida
Lentejas.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Urid Dal Chilka or Lenteja rápida?
Overall, Lenteja rápida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lenteja rápida has fewer calories: 306 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lenteja rápida has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 7 g per 100 g.