Unsweetened Coconut Flakes vs Chips de coco
Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Unsweetened Coconut Flakes | Chips de coco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 667 kcal | 690 kcal |
| Fat | 66.7 g | 67 g |
| Saturated fat | 60 g | 61 g |
| Sugars | 6.7 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 13.3 g | 14 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips de coco has 25% less sugar (5 g vs 6.7 g).
- Chips de coco has 21% more protein (8.4 g vs 6.7 g).
Ingredients
Unsweetened Coconut Flakes
Organic coconut (sliced & dehydrated).
Chips de coco
Noix de coco séchée
FAQ
Which is healthier: Unsweetened Coconut Flakes or Chips de coco?
Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsweetened Coconut Flakes has fewer calories: 667 kcal versus 690 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips de coco has less sugar: 5 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.