Comparison

Unsweetened Coconut Flakes vs Chips de coco

Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientUnsweetened Coconut FlakesChips de coco
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 667 kcal 690 kcal
Fat 66.7 g 67 g
Saturated fat 60 g 61 g
Sugars 6.7 g 5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 13.3 g 14 g
Protein 6.7 g 8.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chips de coco has 25% less sugar (5 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Chips de coco has 21% more protein (8.4 g vs 6.7 g).

Ingredients

Unsweetened Coconut Flakes

Organic coconut (sliced & dehydrated).

Chips de coco

Noix de coco séchée

FAQ

Which is healthier: Unsweetened Coconut Flakes or Chips de coco?

Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Unsweetened Coconut Flakes has fewer calories: 667 kcal versus 690 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chips de coco has less sugar: 5 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons