Comparison
Chips de coco vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips de coco | Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 690 kcal | 650 kcal |
| Fat | 67 g | 62 g |
| Saturated fat | 61 g | 58 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips de coco has 24% less sugar (5 g vs 6.6 g).
- Chips de coco has 36% more fiber (14 g vs 9 g).
Ingredients
Chips de coco
Noix de coco séchée
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Kokos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips de coco or Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)?
Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has fewer calories: 650 kcal versus 690 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips de coco has less sugar: 5 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Coco chips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet...
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet... vs Kokoschips
Kokoschips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet...
Unsweetened Coconut Flak... vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet...
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet... vs Coconut Chips
Chips de coco vs Kokos-Chips
Coco chips vs Chips de coco
Chips de coco vs Kokoschips