Comparison
Kokos-Chips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos-Chips | Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 698 kcal | 650 kcal |
| Fat | 66 g | 62 g |
| Saturated fat | 62 g | 58 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 9.8 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has 45% less sugar (6.6 g vs 12 g).
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kokos-Chips
getrocknete Kokosnuss, Kokosmilch, Zucker
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Kokos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos-Chips or Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)?
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has fewer calories: 650 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 12 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Kokos-Chips vs Kokoschips
Kokos-Chips vs Kokoschips
Unsweetened Coconut Flak... vs Kokos-Chips
Kokos-Chips vs Coconut Chips
Coco chips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet...
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet... vs Kokoschips
Kokoschips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet...
Unsweetened Coconut Flak... vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet...