Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) vs Coconut Chips
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio... | Coconut Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 650 kcal | 683 kcal |
| Fat | 62 g | 64 g |
| Saturated fat | 58 g | 58 g |
| Sugars | 6.6 g | 8.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 15 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Peanuts, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has 19% less sugar (6.6 g vs 8.1 g).
- Coconut Chips has 40% more fiber (15 g vs 9 g).
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Coconut Chips lists: Peanuts, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Kokos
Coconut Chips
Kokoschips, getrocknet. Das Produkt kann Spuren von allen Schalenfrüchten, Erdnüssen, allen glutenhaltigen Getreidearten, Soja und Sesam enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) or Coconut Chips?
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has fewer calories: 650 kcal versus 683 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 8.1 g per 100 g.