Kokoschips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokoschips | Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 635 kcal | 650 kcal |
| Fat | 59 g | 62 g |
| Saturated fat | 56 g | 58 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 23 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has 13% less sugar (6.6 g vs 7.6 g).
- Kokoschips has 61% more fiber (23 g vs 9 g).
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has 14% more protein (7.8 g vs 6.7 g).
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kokoschips
Not available.
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Kokos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokoschips or Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)?
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokoschips has fewer calories: 635 kcal versus 650 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 7.6 g per 100 g.