Coco chips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco chips | Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 698 kcal | 650 kcal |
| Fat | 68 g | 62 g |
| Saturated fat | 64 g | 58 g |
| Sugars | 7.3 g | 6.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco chips has 18% more fiber (11 g vs 9 g).
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has 13% more protein (7.8 g vs 6.8 g).
- Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coco chips
Noix de coco copeaux 100%
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)
Kokos
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco chips or Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)?
Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has fewer calories: 650 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 7.3 g per 100 g.