Comparison

Coco chips vs Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)

Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCoco chipsKokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 1
Calories 698 kcal 650 kcal
Fat 68 g 62 g
Saturated fat 64 g 58 g
Sugars 7.3 g 6.6 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 11 g 9 g
Protein 6.8 g 7.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coco chips has 18% more fiber (11 g vs 9 g).
  • Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has 13% more protein (7.8 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Coco chips

Noix de coco copeaux 100%

Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)

Kokos

FAQ

Which is healthier: Coco chips or Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio)?

Overall, Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has fewer calories: 650 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kokos-Chips, getrocknet (Bio) has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 7.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons