Comparison
Coco chips vs Kokos-Chips
Overall, Coco chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco chips | Kokos-Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 698 kcal | 698 kcal |
| Fat | 68 g | 66 g |
| Saturated fat | 64 g | 62 g |
| Sugars | 7.3 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 9.8 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco chips has 39% less sugar (7.3 g vs 12 g).
- Coco chips has 11% more fiber (11 g vs 9.8 g).
Ingredients
Coco chips
Noix de coco copeaux 100%
Kokos-Chips
getrocknete Kokosnuss, Kokosmilch, Zucker
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco chips or Kokos-Chips?
Overall, Coco chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco chips has fewer calories: 698 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco chips has less sugar: 7.3 g versus 12 g per 100 g.