Comparison
Chips de coco vs Kokos-Chips
Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chips de coco | Kokos-Chips |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 690 kcal | 698 kcal |
| Fat | 67 g | 66 g |
| Saturated fat | 61 g | 62 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 12 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 9.8 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chips de coco has 58% less sugar (5 g vs 12 g).
- Chips de coco has 30% more fiber (14 g vs 9.8 g).
- Chips de coco has 15% more protein (8.4 g vs 7.1 g).
- Chips de coco has the better Nutri-Score.
- Chips de coco is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chips de coco
Noix de coco séchée
Kokos-Chips
getrocknete Kokosnuss, Kokosmilch, Zucker
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chips de coco or Kokos-Chips?
Overall, Chips de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chips de coco has fewer calories: 690 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chips de coco has less sugar: 5 g versus 12 g per 100 g.