Comparison

Tuna Salad Mexican style vs Light Tuna Salad Corn with peas, carrots and black olives

Overall, Tuna Salad Mexican style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTuna Salad Mexican styleLight Tuna Salad Corn with p...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 124 kcal 192 kcal
Fat 5.1 g 14 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 1.7 g
Sugars 2.1 g 2.4 g
Salt 1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 3.2 g 4.8 g
Protein 10.3 g 8.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tuna Salad Mexican style has 35% fewer calories (124 kcal vs 192 kcal).
  • Tuna Salad Mexican style has 64% less fat (5.1 g vs 14 g).
  • Tuna Salad Mexican style has 59% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Light Tuna Salad Corn with peas, carrots and black olives has 33% more fiber (4.8 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Tuna Salad Mexican style has 15% more protein (10.3 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Tuna Salad Mexican style has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tuna Salad Mexican style

25% ton dungat, 23% fasole rosie, 17% porumb, 9% ardei gras rosu, apã, morcovi, ceapã, ulei de floarea-soarelui, sare, zahár, aromà naturalä, boia de ardei iute, agent de ingrosare: gumá de guar,

Light Tuna Salad Corn with peas, carrots and black olives

Сладка царевица 29%, РИБА тон 26%, царевично масло, моркови 11%, грах 11%, черни маслини 3 %, лимонов сок, сол

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tuna Salad Mexican style or Light Tuna Salad Corn with peas, carrots and black olives?

Overall, Tuna Salad Mexican style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tuna Salad Mexican style has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 192 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tuna Salad Mexican style has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons