Comparison

Trix vs Avena crunchy

Overall, Avena crunchy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrixAvena crunchy
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 391 kcal 387 kcal
Fat 4.3 g 5.8 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 1 g
Sugars 22.4 g 4.6 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 5.5 g 11 g
Protein 6.4 g 13 g
Additives51
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Trix has 26% less fat (4.3 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Trix has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Avena crunchy has 79% less sugar (4.6 g vs 22.4 g).
  • Avena crunchy has 50% more fiber (11 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Avena crunchy has 51% more protein (13 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Avena crunchy has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Avena crunchy is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Avena crunchy lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Trix

39,9% Vollkornmaismehl, Maisgrieß, Zucker, Glukosesirup, Sonnenblumenöl, Calciumcarbonat, Verdickungsmittel (Gummi arabicum), Konzentrate aus Süßkartoffeln und Karotten, Kochsalzersatz Kaliumchlorid, natürliches Aroma, Schwarzkarottenkonzentrat, Säureregulator (Natriumcitrate, Citronensäure), Antioxidationsmittel (stark tocopherolhaltige Extrakte), Spirulinaextrakt, Farbstoff (Carotin), Eisen, Niacin, Pantothensäure, Vitamin B6, Riboflavin (Vit. B2), Folsäure.Kann enthalten: MILCH, NÜSSE und GLUTENHALTIGES GETREIDE.

Avena crunchy

Harina integral de avena 85 % (_gluten_) ,sémola de maíz, azúcar, sal, tocoferoles.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trix or Avena crunchy?

Overall, Avena crunchy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Avena crunchy has fewer calories: 387 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Avena crunchy has less sugar: 4.6 g versus 22.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons