Comparison

Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC vs Filets de colin d'Alaska

Overall, Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTranches panées de Colin d'A...Filets de colin d'Alaska
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 173 kcal 170 kcal
Fat 6.5 g 6.8 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1 g 0.6 g
Protein 13 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has 40% more fiber (1 g vs 0.6 g).

Ingredients

Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC

Colin d'Alaska 63%, chapelure 13% (farine de blé, sel, huile de colza, épices, levure), eau, huile de colza, farine de blé, amidons (pomme de terre, blé), farine d'épeautre complet, gluten de blé, sel, poivre noir 0,04%, extrait de poivre noir.

Filets de colin d'Alaska

Filet de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 75 %; Enrobage 25% (eau, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de _blé_, amidon de _blé_, fécule de pomme de terre, farine de riz, _gluten de blé_, farine de maïs, sel, dextrose, semoule de _blé_, épices, huile de citron, huile de citron vert, amidon de tapioca, persil déshydraté).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC or Filets de colin d'Alaska?

Overall, Tranches panées de Colin d'Alaska MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 173 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons